VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
VISION
South Tech’s Vision is
to be a national model for career academy high schools.
MISSION
South Tech Academy’s core mission is to graduate students prepared for
work, higher education, and productive citizenship.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Opening as South Tech Education Center
in 1976 as a vocational training school for adults, was designated South Tech
High School in 1999 for grades 9-12 only, and was approved as a five-year
conversion charter high school in 2004. From 1976 until the present day, South
Tech has maintained its vocational-technical orientation and work-force training
emphasis. Since 1999, South Tech has operated as a wall-to-wall career academy
high school, expanding from three academies serving about 200 students to 13
academies serving about 1300 students (89% minority, 56% FRL, grades 9-12), who
apply for acceptance and who seek to earn regular high school diplomas. South
Tech has never made AYP, earned one F in 2005 and D’s 2006-2009. South Tech was
approved August 19, 2009 for a ten-year charter renewal by the School District
of Palm Beach County.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
1. South Tech has realigned its
administration, master schedule, instructional staff and other human and
material resources to better meet No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandates required
by the district and the state.
2. South Tech instructional staff is
highly qualified and demonstrates the willingness to develop professionally to
meet NCLB standards.
3. South Tech students, generally, are devoted to
their academies and their families want them to graduate.
4. South Tech
utilizes a 4 x 4 block schedule used to support academics and the school’s
thirteen academy programs.
5. Dr. Jeanette Jimenez, new secondary
principal, received her doctorate from Nova Southeastern University with a minor
in Charter School Leadership.
6. South Tech Student, Matthew Vicari, an
Information Technology student, was a gold medal winner with the National
SkillsUSA competition (2009).
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
1. South Tech students are drawn to
the school for its variety of career academies—13 in all. NCLB, however,
mandates that reading and math proficiency, annual progress, taking and passing
exams in rigorous courses (AP, dual enrollment, etc.), and graduating on
schedule, take precedence over job training. One of South Tech’s biggest
challenges--as a wall-to-wall career academy charter school that generates its
own budget--is attracting and recruiting sufficient higher-performing students
who can succeed based on this and Florida’s new School Grade criteria.
2. The lack of parental involvement has been a negative factor in
student achievement, even at the high school level. Open Houses and prior Title
I meetings have attracted approximately 2% of the parent population.
3.
Student absenteeism is at about 11.2% which is negatively impacting student
achievement. (Data obtained from the Florida School Indicators report, 2008.)
4. South Tech’s graduation rate is about 73.5%. (Data obtained from the
Florida School Indicators report, 2008.)
Student Demographics
78% of South Tech students are
minorities; 56% qualify for free or reduced lunch; 47% are male, 53% are female
(Data obtained from Gold Report.) 1.87% of the student population are active
ESOL students, whereas an additional 1.7% are non-active ESOL
students.
Student Attendance Rates
Per the Florida School Indicators
report (2008), student absenteeism is about 11.2%.
Student Mobility
There is a 91.8% Stability Rate for
South Tech Students (Data obtained from the Florida School Indicators report,
2008).
Student Suspension Rates
There is a 10.0% Student Suspension
rate for South Tech Out-of-school suspensions.
Student Retention Rates
There is a 2.3% Non-Promotions Rate
for South Tech students. (Data obtained from the Florida School Indicators
report, 2008).
Class Size
Average class size is
25:1
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
South Tech recruits students,
primarily, from central and southern Palm Beach County middle schools. The
majority of students currently enrolled are from the following Middle Schools,
Grade 8: : Lantana Middle 15%; Lake Worth Middle 15%; Congress Middle 35%,
Woodlands Middle 10%, Odyssey Middle 5%, Tradewinds Middle 15%, and L C Swain
Middle 5%.
Grades and AYP status for each of these feeder schools is as
follows:
Lantana Middle: 2004 Grade: B, AYP: NO; 2005 Grade: C, AYP: NO;
2006 Grade: B, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: B, AYP: NO; 2008 Grade: A, AYP: NO.; 2009
Grade A, AYP: NO
Lake Worth Middle: 2004 Grade: C, AYP: NO; 2005 Grade: C,
AYP: NO; 2006 Grade: C, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: C, AYP: NO, 2008 Grade: C, AYP: NO;
2009 Grade B, AYP: NO
Congress Middle: 2004 Grade: C, AYP: NO; 2005 Grade:
B, AYP: NO; 2006 Grade: B, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: C, AYP: NO; 2008 Grade: B, AYP:
NO; 2009 Grade A, AYP: NO
Woodlands Middle: 2004 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2005
Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2006 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2008 Grade:
A, AYP: NO; 2009 Grade A, AYP: NO
Odyssey Middle: 2004 Grade: B, AYP: NO;
2005 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2006 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2008
Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2009 Grade A, AYP: NO
Tradewinds Middle: 2005 Grade: B,
AYP: NO; 2006 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2008 Grade: A, AYP: NO;
2009 Grade A, AYP: NO
L C Swain: 2006 Grade: B, AYP: NO; 2007 Grade: B, AYP:
NO; 2008 Grade: A, AYP: NO; 2009 Grade A, AYP: NO
Partnerships and Grants
South Tech receives funding from Title
I, IDEA, School Improvement and Perkins grants through the District. South Tech
administers the Adult With Disabilities grant.
South Tech received a $5K
grant from TD Bank and applies for various grants that refer to our school
programs. Our business partners include, but are not limited to, A Special “T”,
Career Connection, Inc.,
ABC Supply, Carlton Fields, AccuStaff, Inc.,
Carpenter Contractors of America, Ace Beauty, Carquest Auto Parts, Action Cycle
Salvage Carter, Lippman Corp., Adcamp Associates, Centex Homes, Affinity
Plastics, Inc.,Checkers, Al Hendrickson Toyota, Cheesecake Factory, Albertson’s,
Cheney Brothers,Alldata, Chick-Fil-A,Animal House, Chipola College, Anthony’s
Auto Body,Chipotle,Any Kind Checks Cashed, Cici’s Pizza,
Apac Teleservices,
City of Boynton Beach Fire Rescue, APM Studio,City of Boynton Beach, Public
Works,Arby’s,City of Delray Beach,ARG Marine,City of West Palm Beach, Parks
& Recreation,Arnst Ocean Automotive,City Towing,Arrigo Dodge,Clear Copy
Inc., Printers
Artisans Salon,Climate Control,ASG Imaging,Climatrol, Quality
Aluminum Products, Inc.,Atlantic Refrigeration Corp.,Coldstone Creamery,
Atlantis Golf Club,Colonial Animal Hospital,Auto Zone,Colony Bay Nursing
Home,Babies R Us,Comcast,Banyan Printing,TD Bank,Barefoot Pools, Inc.,Compass
Health System,Beall’s,Compscript,Bell South Mobility,Contemporary Cabinet
Designs,Bethesda Hospital,Cook Lumber & Treating,Bill Clarke Marine Service,
Inc.,Copy’s Uniforms,Blossom Brothers Designs,Coral Breeze Animal
Hospital,Boathouse Marina, Coral Cadillac,Boca Beauty Academy,Costco –
Marketing,Boca Raton Habilitation Center, Cracker Barrell,Boca Resort,Criminal
Justice Commission,
Boynton Auto Clinic,D & M Aluminum,Boynton Beach
Chamber of Commerce,De Carlo Auto Shop,BP Station,Delray Acura,Burger
King,Delray Mazda,
Car Art LLC,Direct TV,Discount Auto Parts,Hunter
Engineering Company,
Dixie Metal Products, Inc.,Hurricane Alley
Restaurant,Dollar Tree,I Car,
Double Tree Guest Suites,Intracostal
Signs,Drug Abuse Foundation,Iron Eagle Motorcycles,A & S Cleaning,J.H.S.
Marine, Inc.,E Z Marine,JC Penny’s Boynton Mall Salon,Econo Auto Painting and
Body Works, Jeff Industries,Ed Carey Designs,Jewish Federation,Elios Mobil Auto
Repair,Jim Pierce Auto Body,Ellie’s Diner,JKF Hospital,Emmanuel Catholic
Church,John Francis & Company,Engle Homes,Johnson & Wales
University,Expert Network,Jason’s Deli,F.A.S.T. Fl Aluminum Structure &
Trailer,Keyes Realty,Fade to Black Productions, Lake Worth Drainage
District,Fancy Interiors, Inc., Lakeside Nursing Home,Firestone Tire &
Service Centers,Lawson Industries, Inc., First Impressions Private Pre-School,
Lenar Homes,Flagler Title Company,Levenger,Florentine Marble,Liberty Park
Elementary,Florida AC Contractors Association,Liberty Tax,Florida Atlantic
University,Lincoln College
Florida Culinary Institute,Lincoln Technical
Institute,Florida Foundation Systems, Inc.,Little Caesar’s,Florida Plumbing
Apprenticeship Association,Lowe’s,Foreign Car Engineering,Lube
Connection,Fountain View,Mac II Salon,Freddy Guerron Mechanic,Manor Care Health
Services,Freelance-Graphic Design,Marcin Animal Management,
Future
Stars,Marine Exhaust Systems, Inc.,G.U.S. Boat Maintenance,Marriott
Suites,Gateway Marina,Marriott-Crocker Center,
General Rental
Center,Marshalls,George Snow Foundation, Matco Tools,
Gold Coast
Builders,McDonalds,Gordon Food Service,Medical Business Service,Great Printing,
Mercantile Bank,Hair Club for Men,Morse Life,
Hall’s Hardware,Motorcycle
Mechanics Institute,Hayes Electric,Muvico Theaters,Herf Jones,Myers Plumbing
Company, Inc.,Home Depot,NAPA,
Horner Equipment,Natural Trend
Setters,Hospice By The Sea, Nine West,
Nolas Pizza,Seagull Industries,Office
Depot,Sears,Padron Brothers Flooring,Serraes Construction,Palm Beach Atlantic
University,Shearmagic Salon & Spa,Palm Beach Community College,Sheridan
Technical Ed. Center,
Palm Beach County Film & Television Commission,Sir
Electric, Inc.,
Palm Beach County Iron Workers,Snap-On Tools,Palm Beach
Fleet Management,South Florida Fair,Palm Beach Habilitation Center,State of
Florida, Vocational Rehabilitation,Palm Beach International Airport,Steak n
Shake,Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office – Animal Kindness,Stilzink Inc.,Palm Beach
Yacht,Stormin’ Norman’s,Palm Healthcare Foundation,Sun Sentinel,Palm Tran
Connections,Sunrise Cinema,
Panera Bread,Sunshine Golf Cart,Papa Johns,Super
Cuts,Parker’s Custom Sheet Metal Products,T.J. Maxx,Paul Mitchell Educator, Andy
Rossi,Tamarac Concrete,Paul Stevenson, Inc.,Target,Personal Touch Glass &
Mirror,Ted Center,PetsMart,The Arc,Pine Tree Country Club, Executive Chef,The
Boat Connection,Pizza Hut,The Boatman/Larry Woods Marine,
Plastridge
Insurance Agency,The Gap,Plumber I Am, Inc., The Palm Beach Post,Plumbing Air
Conditioning, Tire Kingdom,Pollo Tropical,Tony’s Body Shop,Powell
Landscaping,Top Notch Salon & Barbers,Power Plus,Transeastern
Homes,Precision USA,Turner Outdoor Equipment,Primerica,Universal Technical
Institute,Publix,UPS,Puppy Love Dog Grooming,Vans Comfortemp,R & F
International Corp., Village Royale Animal Clinic,Regal Cinema,Vision
Salon,Regents Bank,Wachovia Mortgage Company,Regents Park,Walgreen’s,Robert
McGill AC, Inc., Walmart,
Robert Morgan Ed Center,Washington Mutual,Russell
B. Jennings A/C,West Boca Medical Center,Sam’s Club, West Palm Beach Auto
Auction, Inc.,
Sandy’s International Salon,Willard Brothers Construction,
Sasing,Wings Plus,School District of Palm Beach County, Winn-Dixie,
Seacrest Veterinary,Woolbright Mobil On the Run,Wurth USA, Inc.,
Young
Chef’s Academy,and the 99 Cent Store.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser
window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend
Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position |
Name |
Degree(s)/ Certification(s) |
# of Years at Current School |
# of Years as an Administrator |
Prior Performance Record * |
| Principal |
James R.
Kidd |
Bachelor’s,
Master’s, Educational Specialist Degrees; Certified (FDOE #165914) in
Physical Education, Carpentry, Vocational Education Director,
Educational Leadership
|
18
|
18
|
2009: D, NO AYP
2008: D,
NO AYP
2007: D, NO AYP
2006: D, NO AYP
2005: F, NO
AYP
|
| Principal |
Jeanette L.
Jimenez |
Bachelor’s in
Psychology, Master’s in Special Education, Educational Specialist
Certificate, Doctorate in Education; FL Certification in Special Education
& Educational Leadership; Reading Endorsement. |
9
|
4
|
2009: D, NO AYP
2008: D,
NO AYP
2007: D, NO AYP
2006: D, NO AYP
2005: F, NO
AYP
|
| Assis
Principal |
Lisa
Chirikjian |
Bachelor’s in
Physical Education Master’s in Educational Leadership
Certification in Physical Education, Education Leadership, Health
Education, Coaching Certificate. ESOL Endorsement
|
1
|
1
|
2009; C, No AYP
2008; B,
No AYP
2007; B, No AYP
2006; B, No AYP
2005; D, No
AYP |
| Assis
Principal |
Myron Cost
|
Masters
Administration/ Supervision K-12 Local Director of Vocational
Ed. Teacher Coordinator of Cooperative Ed. Automotive Technology
|
6
|
16
|
2009: D, NO AYP
2008: D,
NO AYP
2007: D, NO AYP
2006: D, NO AYP
2005: F, NO
AYP
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP
information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area |
Name |
Degree(s)/ Certification(s) |
# of Years at Current School |
# of Years as a Coach |
Prior Performance Record * |
| Reading
Coach |
Matthew
Benoliel |
English 6-12;
Reading Endorsement |
1
|
|
0
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP
information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy |
Person Responsible |
Projected Completion Date |
Not Applicable (If not, please explain
why) |
| 1. Recruitment: Attend
district job fairs; post vacancies on website and in local newspapers;
salaries competitive with school district salary scale; |
Personnel
Manager, Vice Principal |
Continual
|
|
2. Retention: Monetary
stipends are offered for completing the Reading Endorsement components;
one extra paid duty day during pre-school is given; support offered with
New Teacher/Mentor program; additional activities offered for supplemental
income such as clubs, and tutoring.
|
Personnel
Manager |
Continual
|
|
| 3. Substitutes for staff
development and in-service opportunities (CRISS, Clinical Education
Training, etc.) aligned with and/or provided by the district; paid
application and filing fees for teachers pursuing National Board
Certification; safe and secure working environment. |
Director of
Academies and Operations |
Continual
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name |
Certification |
Teaching Assignment |
Professional Development/Support to
Become Highly Qualified |
| Deanna Allen |
English
6-12 |
Intensive
Reading |
Currently
enrolled in Reading Competencies 3 and 4 |
| Richard Brinker |
English
6-12,Guidance K-12 |
Intensive
Reading |
Currently
enrolled in Reading Competencies 4 & 5 |
| Mia Campbell |
English
6-12 |
Intensive
Reading |
Currently
enrolled in Reading Competency 3 |
| Laura O'Leary |
English
6-12 |
Intensive
Reading |
Currently
enrolled in Reading Competency 6
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff |
% of First-Year Teachers |
% of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience |
% of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience |
% of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience |
% of Teachers with Advanced Degrees |
% Highly Qualified |
% Reading Endorsed Teachers |
% National Board Certified Teachers |
% ESOL Endorsed |
| 37 |
1 |
40 |
45 |
15 |
28 |
89 |
32 |
0 |
60 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name |
Mentee Assigned |
Rationale for Pairing |
Planned Mentoring Activities |
| Michelle Carson |
Dori
Halperin |
Model
Language Arts Classroom |
District
ESP Program Common Planning Period
|
| Gidget Barretta |
Scott
Simpson |
Model
Science Teacher, shared student population |
District
ESP Program Common Planning Period
|
| Carolee Ellison |
Michelle Brown |
Shared
Student Population |
District
ESP Program Common Planning Period
|
| Susan LaRocca |
Todd
Wallace |
Shared
Student Population; Department Head |
District
ESP Program Common Planning Period
|
| Neil Breault |
Leena
Thomas |
Shared
Student Population; Department Head |
District
ESP Program Common Planning Period
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
With regard to this law’s mandates
related to the “basic educational program aimed at improving the academic
achievement of the disadvantaged,” South Tech has always been guided and
monitored by the district’s Department of Charter Schools (annual audits, etc.),
and Department of School Improvement, following all initiatives of the
district’s Chief Academic Officer regarding academic standards, academic rigor,
assessment, fiscal and student achievement accountability, highly-qualified
teachers, and parental involvement. South Tech has hired a resource teacher for
reading and an additional English teacher to maintain a reduced class size in
Language Arts classes. These expenses will be paid using Title I funds. As
additional training on new curriculum requirements and software will be
necessary for teachers in language arts, math and science, Title I funds will be
used to pay for substitutes when teachers are attending these trainings during
instructional days.
Stimulus funds were also budgeted for additional reading
resource materials in the media and a new science/math program available to all
students on the computer. (Gizmo) Tutoring on all subjects will be provided
using Title I funds. Transportation will also be provided for students who
participate in after school tutoring. As family involvement is key in student
achievement, over 10% of Title I and Stimulus funds were designated for various
mediums to keep parents informed. Open houses, parent trainings, informational
mailings, part-time parent liaison position, meetings, and South Tech’s website
are some of the ways we keep parents/guardians up to date of what is happening
at their student’s school.and newsletters.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
South Tech students qualifying for
this support participate in college visits sponsored by the Department of
Migrant Education.
Title I, Part D
South Tech’s Innovative Options
program serves students who have dropped out of school (but have earned at least
14 credits), are 17-21 years old, want to earn a Diploma, and who need to raise
their GPA or pass FCAT to graduate.
The Credit Lab is available for students
currently enrolled in any school, who need to recover credits in failed classes
or improve a D grade.
Title II
NA
Title III
Assists with helping eligible limited
English proficient and immigrant students attain English proficiency and meet
the same state standards required of all students.
Title X- Homeless
McKinney-Vento Homeless Education
Program—Homeless children and youth are minors who lack a fixed, regular, and
adequate nighttime residence. It includes children and youth who are sharing the
housing of other persons due to economic hardship; are living in motels, hotels,
trailer parks, or camping groups due to lack of alternative adequate
accommodations; are living in emergency or transitional shelters; are abandoned
in hospitals; are awaiting foster placement; have a primary nighttime residence
that is a public or private place not designed for human sleeping
accommodations; are living in cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned buildings,
substandard housing, bus or train stations or similar settings; are migrant
children and youth who qualify as homeless as described above. Homeless children
and youth are entitled to immediate public school enrollment at the school last
attended at the onset of homelessness, provided it is in the best interest of
the student, requested by the parents, and is feasible.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Funds are used to supplement salary
costs in order to provide the 4 x 4 block schedule for the students and to
reduce class size.
Violence Prevention Programs
South Tech has implemented all
measures mandated by the “Jeffrey Johnston Stand Up For All Students Acts”
Section 1006.147, Florida Statutes, in conjunction with Board policy 5.002,
entitled “Prohibition of Bullying and Harassment”. These measures included: a
policy overview and filmstrip presentation to all staff members, distribution
and placement of posters throughout the school, establishment of a school
contact telephone number along with a Bullying Harassment Anonymous Report Form
and Drop Box and a District Incident Report Website. Primary and secondary staff
members have been identified and assigned to monitor the phone, written or
website
Bullying/Harassment Incident Reports twice daily. Communication of
the new Definitions stated in Section 4 and the Expected Behaviors On School
Property or At School Related Function stated in Section 5 of Policy 5.002 will
be included in the Student/Parent Handbook along with the South Tech Staff
Handbook and Website.
Nutrition Programs
South Tech utilizes the school
districts food service program, meeting all Nutrition Program guidelines.
Housing Programs
NA
Head Start
NA
Adult Education
South Tech offers evening classes for
Adults in a range of job-related skills. These classes are advertised three
times a year in a pull-out from the Palm Beach Post and in a fourth separate
mailing/inserts via the Penny Saver. In addition, students 17-20 may earn a high
school diploma in Innovative Options, a program that operates 2:00-8:15 PM
Monday-Thursday. Our English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) and GED
programs provide educational services with child care four nights per week.
Career and Technical Education
South Tech is a wall-to-wall career
academy high school—every student who attends the school must be enrolled in one
of 13 career academies: Automotive Service Technology, Automotive Collision and
Repair, Culinary Arts, Residential Construction, Cosmetology, Film &
Broadcast, Finance, Commercial Art Technology, Information Technology, Marine
Service Technology, Motorcycle Service Technology, Nursing & Health
Occupations, Veterinary Assisting. Students must satisfactorily complete their
elective requirements for graduation, exclusively within their academies, and
they may also earn Occupational Completion Points related to their academy field
of study.
Job Training
As part of the training for certain
career academies in the trades and industry formats, qualified 11th and 12th
grade students can participate in paid on-the-job training during part of every
school day. This on-the-job training must correspond to the student’s career
academy training.
Other
The Credit Lab is available during the
school year Monday-Wednesday, 2:00-6:00 PM, and during the summer for five weeks
for students who need to recover credits in failed classes or to improve a grade
of D. Students must have permission from the Assistant Principal at the school
they currently attend, in order to enroll in the Credit Lab.
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject,
etc.) |
PLC Leader |
Frequency of PLC Meetings |
Schedule (when) |
Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson
Study and Data Analysis) |
| Pre-School Meetings |
Administration & Faculty
|
3 days
during pre-school |
Aug. 10, 12,
17 |
Welcome back
informative meeting on student achievement, discipline, and teacher
accountability |
| Learning Team Meetings
|
Reading Coach |
bimonthly |
Every other
Thursday |
Implement FCAT
strategies, teach VO teachers how to implement into their
curriculum |
| Department Meetings |
Department Heads |
bimonthly |
Varies by
department |
Principal
passed forth information in regards to our school through Department
heads. Questions were answered.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
NA
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
South Tech Academy has incorporated
targeted tutoring into its curriculum to target the lowest 25% in Reading, Math,
and Science. We look at the data and the different areas of needs to pinpoint
the students’ weaknesses and group students together. Then we pull-out students
to attend targeted tutoring sessions from their elective class so as to minimize
loss of core academic instructional time. We have noticed higher student
achievement since we have implemented this prescriptive tutoring.
According
to the High School Feedback Report, our diligence with targeted tutoring should
increase student achievement thereby improving student readiness for the public
postsecondary level.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal |
| Needs
Assessment: |
Based
on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total
percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent
change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in
proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not,
which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the
lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of
students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number
tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making
learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
| Based
on the 2009 FCAT Reading data, 28% of students achieved mastery on
the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading Test, while 66% of White
students, 74% of Black students, 81% of Hispanic students, 79% of
Disadvantaged students, and 93% of Students With Disabilities scored
below grade level. |
Increase
the percent of White Students, Black Students, Hispanic Students,
Disadvantaged Students, and Students With Disabilities scoring at or
above grade level in reading to 72% on the 2010 FCAT Reading
Test |
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
1.Focus
on areas of weakness-Words and Phrases in Context and Reference and
Research
|
1.
Reading Coach, Vice Principal
|
1.
PD for teachers, Classroom walkthroughs
|
1.
CWT, Lesson Plans, Diagnostic Reports
|
| 2 |
2.
Increase Literacy practice across content areas by focusing on
reading and writing activities across the curriculum
|
2.
Reading Coach, Vice Principal |
2.
PD for teachers, Classroom walkthroughs |
2.
CWT, Teacher Lesson Plans, Diagnostic Reports
|
| 3 |
3.
Implement the EDGE Program in ninth and tenth grade English
classes. |
3.
Reading Coach, Vice Principal |
3.
Administration will be familiar with the EDGE program and monitor
using classroom walkthroughs |
3.
Progress will be measured by EDGE embedded Assessments.
|
| 4 |
Identify
and closely monitor the progress of the lowest 25 percentile
consistently; revise instruction and intervention groups as
indicated by student progress. |
Reading
Coach, Vice Principal,and Reading Teachers. |
Student
progress assessed using diagnostic tests and reading embedded
assessments for all students receiving intensive reading
instruction. |
SSS
Diagnostic Test and reading embedded assessment data will be used to
determine progress towards identified benchmarks.
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
| In
grades 9-10, 40% of students achieved learning gains on the 2009
administration of the FCAT Reading Test. |
In
grades 9-10, 46% of students will achieve learning gains on the 2010
administration of the FCAT Reading Test. |
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
1.
Students paired with faculty “mentor” to monitor progress. Mentors
will be adults on staff other than classroom teachers (deans,
guidance counselors)
|
1.
Vice Principal
|
1.
Mentors will report to administrators.
|
1.
Student conferences and student surveys
|
| 2 |
2.
Teachers will be trained on small group instruction to focus on
lowest 25%
|
2.
Reading Coach
|
2.
Classroom Walkthroughs, ongoing training
|
2.
CWT |
| 3 |
3.
FAIR Assessment tools will be incorporated
|
3.
Reading Coach
|
3.
On-going FAIR monitoring
|
3.
FAIR Assessment | |
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed |
Content/Topic |
Facilitator |
Target Date |
Strategy for Follow-up/
Monitoring |
Person Responsible for
Monitoring |
| In grade 10, 34% of the
students will achieve mastery for reading on the 2010 FCAT Reading
Test |
PD from Reading Coach and
Capacity Development Team |
School Reading Coach and
District Capacity Development Team |
August-first training,
follow up trainings on weekly basis with small
groups/departments |
Classroom
Walkthroughs |
Vice Principal
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the
Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every
Teacher
At South Tech Academy all
teachers have been encouraged to obtain their Reading Endorsement.
Additionally, teachers will be instructed on how to reinforce Reading
Skills in each lesson across the curriculum. Core academic teachers will
utilize the Curriculum Framework as provided by the district, including,
but not limited to bellringers/focus lessons, lesson plans, and embedded
assessments. This will begin in pre-school and process will be on-going
throughout the year. The District Coaching Model and support from Capacity
Development Team will ensure that both academic and academy teachers
receive proper training through monthly professional development meetings
and department meetings. |
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Purchase of Edge Reading
Series for Intensive Reading classes |
Operating Funds |
$45,000.00 |
| Purchase
of resource materials for media center. |
Operating Funds |
$3,500.00 |
| Materials to implement
Language Arts Curriculum Frameworks within the classrooms. |
Operating Funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Total:
$58,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| FCAT Explorer |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Total:
$0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Utilize the FCIM to identify
students in the core curriculum needing intervention and
enrichment |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Utilize
the FCIM to identify students in the core curriculum needing
intervention and enrichment |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Monies for substitutes for
teacher to attend additional Language Arts Training |
Title I Funds |
$12,000.00 |
| Teachers
to attend Advanced Placement Training |
Title I
Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Hire resource teacher to
assist with reading instruction. |
Title I Funds |
$60,000.00 |
| Total:
$75,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Media specialist purchased
the Perfection Learning-opt. 3 high-interest library books for
student use. |
Title I Stimulus Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Total:
$5,000.00 |
| Final
Total: $138,500.00 | |
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal |
| Needs
Assessment: |
Based
on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total
percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent
change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in
proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not,
which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the
lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of
students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number
tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making
learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
| Based on the
2009 FCAT 68% of students achieved mastery on the 2009
administration of the FCAT Math Test, while 23% of White students,
40% of Black students, 38% of Hispanic students, 38% of Economically
Disadvantaged students, and 54% of Students With Disabilities,
scored below grade level. |
Increase the
percent of White students, Black students, Hispanic students,
Economically Disadvantaged students, and Students With Disabilities,
scoring at or above grade to 74% on the 2010 FCAT Math Test.
|
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
1.
Use of the Curriculum Frameworks with modifications for our 4 x 4
block schedule
|
1.
Math Dept. Heads, Vice Principal
|
1.
Classroom assessments, embedded assessments, student portfolios, and
classroom walkthroughs.
|
1.
Results from Core embedded assessments, diagnostic evaluations,
CWT’s and FCAT tests.
|
| 2 |
2.
Utilize the FCIM to identify students in the core curriculum needing
intervention and enrichment
|
2.
Math Dept. Heads and math teachers
|
2.
Weekly department meetings, classroom visits by department heads,
and classroom walkthroughs by administration.
|
2.
Results of embedded assessments, teacher observations, and
administration observations.
|
| 3 |
3.
Offer tutoring after school and pull-out during day.
|
3.
Vice Principal and assigned math tutor
|
3.
Vice Principal and math tutor will monitor use of tutoring.
|
3.
Vice Principal and math tutor observations.
|
| 4 |
4.
Grouping students in math courses based on FCAT levels.
|
4.
Vice Principal, Guidance Counselors, and Math Dept Heads
|
4.
Monitoring of student schedules, progress reports, and classroom
visits.
|
4.
Student checks by guidance counselors, and observations by
Department Heads and administration.
|
| 5 |
Identify
and closely monitor the progress of the lowest 25 percentile
consistently; revise instruction and intervention groups as
indicated by student progress. |
Vice
Principal, Guidance Counselors, Math Dept Heads, and Math
Teachers. |
Maintain
a record of strategies and interventions utilized with the lowest 25
percent. |
Increased
achievement between assessments throughout the year.
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
| In grade 9,
73% of students achieved mastery on the 2010 administration of the
Fall Diagnostic Math Test |
In grade 9,
85% of the students will achieve mastery on the 2010 Spring
Diagnostic Math Test |
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
Use
of the Curriculum Frameworks with modifications for our 4 x 4 block
schedule |
Math
Dept. Heads, Vice Principal |
Classroom
assessments, embedded assessments, student portfolios, and classroom
walkthroughs. |
Results
from Core embedded assessments, diagnostic evaluations, CWT's and
FCAT tests. |
| 2 |
Utilize
the FCIM to identify students in the core curriculum needing
intervention and enrichment. |
Math
Dept. Heads and math teachers |
Weekly
department meetings, classroom visits by department heads, and
classroom walkthroughs by administration. |
Results
of embedded assessments, teacher observations, and administration
observations. |
| 3 |
Offer
tutoring after school and pull-out during day. |
Vice
Principal and assigned math tutor. |
Vice
Principal and math tutor will monitor use of tutoring. |
Vice
Principal and math tutor observations. |
| 4 |
Grouping
students in math courses based on FCAT levels. |
Vice
Principal, Guidance Counselors, and Math Dept. Heads. |
Monitoring
of students schedules, progress reports, and classroom
visits. |
Student
checks by guidance counselors, and observations by Department Heads
and administration. | |
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed |
Content/Topic |
Facilitator |
Target Date |
Strategy for Follow-up/
Monitoring |
Person Responsible for
Monitoring |
| In grade 10, 74% of the
students will achieve mastery on the 2010 FCAT Math Test |
Analyzing student data,
developing student portfolios and student action plans. |
Use of District
Capacity Development Team member for Mathematics |
Ongoing |
Monthly meetings with
Mathematics Capacity Development Rep., Weekly department meetings,
classroom visits by department heads, and classroom walkthroughs by
administration. |
Results from Core embedded
assessments, diagnostic evaluations, CWT’s, classroom assessments
and observations, and FCAT tests |
| In grade 9, 85% of the
students will achieve mastery on the 2010 Spring Diagnostic Math
Test |
Analyzing student data,
developing student portfolios and student action plans. |
Use of District
Capacity Development Team member for Mathematics |
Use of District Capacity
Development Team member for Mathematics |
Monthly meetings with
Mathematics Capacity Development Rep., Weekly department meetings,
classroom visits by department heads, and classroom walkthroughs by
administration. |
Results from Core embedded
assessments, diagnostic evaluations, CWT’s, classroom assessments
and observations, and FCAT tests
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Purchase of supplemental
materials to enhance instruction. |
Operating Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Total:
$3,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Teachers will utilize GIZMO
to supplement classroom instruction |
Title I Stimulus Funds |
$1,350.00 |
| Purchase
of student calculators for classroom instruction. |
Operating Funds |
$1,200.00 |
| Total:
$2,550.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Curriculum Frameworks |
Title I Funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Utilize
the FCIM to identify students in the core curriculum needing
intervention and enrichment. |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Use of Consultants to assist
with teacher development in Math |
Title I Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Total:
$13,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| After-school tutoring will be
available to students for Math |
Title I Funds |
$4,000.00 |
| Total:
$4,000.00 |
| Final Total:
$22,550.00 | |
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal |
| Needs
Assessment: |
Based
on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or
was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed
decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
| In
grade 11, 20% of students achieved mastery on the 2009
administration of the FCAT Science Test |
In
grade 11, 27% of students will achieve mastery on the 2010
administration of the FCAT Science Test. |
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
.
Weekly meetings with science teachers to implement Curriculum
Frameworks |
.
Science department head and administration |
Classroom
assessments, embedded assessments, student portfolios, and classroom
walkthroughs. |
Results
from Core embedded assessments, daily and weekly mini assessments of
AA benchmarks, diagnostic evaluations, CWT’s and FCAT tests.
|
| 2 |
Follow
up meetings to discuss problems, concerns and best practices.
|
Science
department head |
Classroom
assessments, embedded assessments, student portfolios, and classroom
walkthroughs. |
.student
assessments and instructor observations |
| 3 |
Identification
and monitoring of students not making sufficient progress and
implementation of remedial activities |
Science
department head and administration |
Classroom
assessments, embedded assessments, student portfolios, and classroom
walkthroughs. |
student
assessments and instructor observations |
| 4 |
.
Implementation of 17 Essential labs to all 11th graders in
Integrated Science 2 and Chemistry classes |
Science
Teachers and Administration |
Classroom
observations. |
Classroom
walkthroughs and FCAT Science Test |
| 5 |
Use
EDW to identify weak areas and have one-on-one discussions with
students, develop remedial mini lessons for areas of weakness
|
Science
department head and science instructors |
Examination
of EDW reports, successful completion of remedial work in areas of
weakness |
Student
conferences and examination of remedial works.
| |
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed |
Content/Topic |
Facilitator |
Target Date |
Strategy for Follow-up/
Monitoring |
Person Responsible for
Monitoring |
| In grade 11, 27% of
students will achieve mastery on the 2010 administration of the FCAT
Science Test. |
Classroom Strategies to
improve FCAT Science Scores |
Capacity Development
Team Member for Science |
Ongoing |
Teacher Feedback and
classroom observations |
Science teachers, Science
Department Head and Vice Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Purchase of supplemental
materials to enhance instruction. |
Operating Funds |
$12,000.00 |
| Total:
$12,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Teachers will utilize GIZMO
to supplement classroom instruction. |
Title I Stimulus Funds |
$1,350.00 |
| Total:
$1,350.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Science teachers will attend
Advanced Placement Training |
Operating Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Use of
Consultants to assist with teacher development in Science |
Title I
Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Total:
$8,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| After school tutoring will be
available to students for Writing |
Title I Funds |
$4,000.00 |
| Total:
$4,000.00 |
| Final
Total: $25,350.00 | |
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal |
| Needs
Assessment: |
Based
on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or
was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed
decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
| In
grade 10, 83% of students achieved mastery on the 2009
administration of the FCAT Writing Test |
On the
2010 FCAT Writes 89% of the students will achieve a 3.5 or
better. |
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
Teacher
will use prescriptive feedback to analyze student sample
writing. |
Vice
Principal, Language Arts Instructional Leaders |
Data
from PB Writes and common assessments. |
PB
Writes, and classroom writing prompts.
| |
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed |
Content/Topic |
Facilitator |
Target Date |
Strategy for Follow-up/
Monitoring |
Person Responsible for
Monitoring |
| In grade 10, 89% of
students will achieve mastery on the 2010 administration of the FCAT
Writing Test. |
Writing Across Content
Areas |
Reading Coach and
Capacity Development Team |
Ongoing |
Classroom walkthroughs and
Professional Development Activities. |
Reading Coach, Vice
Principal, and Capacity Development Team member.
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Purchase of supplemental
materials to enhance instruction. |
Operating Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Total:
$3,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| No
Data |
No
Data |
$0.00 |
| Total:
$0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| No
Data |
No
Data |
$0.00 |
| Total:
$0.00 |
| Other |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| After school tutoring will be
available to students for Writing |
Title I Funds |
$4,000.00 |
| Total:
$4,000.00 |
| Final
Total: $7,000.00 | |
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal |
| Needs
Assessment: |
Based
on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress
Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to
areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys,
evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent
participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior
year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to
increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the
Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked
to Area of Improvement |
Based
on the 2009 FCAT Reading data, 28% of students achieved mastery on
the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading Test, while 66% of White
students, 74% of Black students, 81% of Hispanic students, 79% of
Disadvantaged students, and 93% of Students With Disabilities scored
below grade level. Based on the 2009 FCAT 68% of students achieved
mastery on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Math Test, while 23%
of White students, 40% of Black students, 38% of Hispanic students,
38% of Economically Disadvantaged students, and 54% of Students With
Disabilities, scored below grade level. Current parental
activation of Edline is 55%. |
Increase
the percent of White Students, Black Students, Hispanic Students,
Disadvantaged Students, and Students With Disabilities scoring at or
above grade level in reading to 72% on the 2010 FCAT Reading Test.
Increase the percent of White students, Black students, Hispanic
students, Economically Disadvantaged students, and Students With
Disabilities, scoring at or above grade to 74% on the 2010 FCAT Math
Test. |
| |
Action
Step |
Person
Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process
Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation
Tool |
| 1 |
1.
Reading Night Parent Training |
1.
Parent Liaison 2. Reading Coach 3. Language Arts Teachers
|
1.
Increase the number of parents attending the Parent Training
|
1.
Evaluation Form 2. Sign In Sheet 3. Parent Link Monitoring
|
| 2 |
1.
Math Night Parent Training |
1.
Parent Liaison 2. Math Department Head
|
1.
Increase the number of parents attending the Parent Training
|
1.
Evaluation Form 2. Sign In Sheet 3. Parent Link Monitoring
|
| 3 |
1.
Science Night Parent Training |
1.
Parent Liaison 2. Science Department Head
|
1.
Increase the number of parents attending the Parent Training
|
1.
Evaluation Form 2. Sign In Sheet 3. Parent Link Monitoring
|
| 4 |
1.
Parent training during open house 2. Flyers sent home 4 times a
year. 3. Create Parent Link message about Edline
|
1.
Technology Coordinator 2. Vice Principal
|
1.
Edline monitoring |
1.
Check Edline usage |
| 5 |
Recruit
volunteers to be active in school for helping with graduation and
school functions throughout the year. (i.e. dances, pet washes,
field trips). |
Volunteer
Coordinator and Club Sponsors |
Increase
the number of volunteersattending school functions. |
1.
Computer Sign In System | |
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed |
Content/Topic |
Facilitator |
Target Date |
Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring |
Person Responsible for
Monitoring |
| No data
submitted | |
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Purchase of Supplies and
In-House Printing Materials for Parent Trainings and reference |
Title I Regular |
$8,000.00 |
| Total:
$8,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
|
|
$0.00 |
| Total:
$0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
|
|
$0.00 |
| Total:
$0.00 |
| Other |
| Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Provide funding for a school
|
Title I |
$11,500.00 |
| Parent
Liaison |
Operating Funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Total:
$21,500.00 |
| Final
Total: $29,500.00 | |
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for
this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Reading |
Purchase of Edge Reading Series for
Intensive Reading classes |
Operating Funds |
$45,000.00 |
| Reading |
Purchase of
resource materials for media center. |
Operating
Funds |
$3,500.00 |
| Reading |
Materials to implement Language
Arts Curriculum Frameworks within the classrooms. |
Operating Funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Purchase of
supplemental materials to enhance instruction. |
Operating
Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Writing |
Purchase of supplemental materials
to enhance instruction. |
Operating Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Science |
Purchase of
supplemental materials to enhance instruction. |
Operating
Funds |
$12,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Purchase of Supplies and In-House
Printing Materials for Parent Trainings and reference |
Title I Regular |
$8,000.00 |
| Total:
$84,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Reading |
FCAT Explorer |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Teachers will
utilize GIZMO to supplement classroom instruction |
Title I
Stimulus Funds |
$1,350.00 |
| Mathematics |
Purchase of student calculators for
classroom instruction. |
Operating Funds |
$1,200.00 |
| Science |
Teachers will
utilize GIZMO to supplement classroom instruction. |
Title I
Stimulus Funds |
$1,350.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
|
|
$0.00 |
| Total:
$3,900.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Reading |
Utilize the FCIM to identify
students in the core curriculum needing intervention and enrichment |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Reading |
Utilize the
FCIM to identify students in the core curriculum needing intervention and
enrichment |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Reading |
Monies for substitutes for teacher
to attend additional Language Arts Training |
Title I Funds |
$12,000.00 |
| Reading |
Teachers to
attend Advanced Placement Training |
Title I
Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Reading |
Hire resource teacher to assist
with reading instruction. |
Title I Funds |
$60,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Curriculum
Frameworks |
Title I
Funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Utilize the FCIM to identify
students in the core curriculum needing intervention and enrichment. |
NA |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Use of
Consultants to assist with teacher development in Math |
Title I
Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Science |
Science teachers will attend
Advanced Placement Training |
Operating Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Science |
Use of
Consultants to assist with teacher development in Science |
Title I
Funds |
$3,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
|
|
$0.00 |
| Total:
$96,000.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description
of Resources |
Funding
Source |
Available
Amount |
| Reading |
Media specialist purchased the
Perfection Learning-opt. 3 high-interest library books for student use. |
Title I Stimulus Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
After-school
tutoring will be available to students for Math |
Title I
Funds |
$4,000.00 |
| Writing |
After school tutoring will be
available to students for Writing |
Title I Funds |
$4,000.00 |
| Science |
After school
tutoring will be available to students for Writing |
Title I
Funds |
$4,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Provide funding for a school |
Title I |
$11,500.00 |
| Parental
Involvement |
Parent
Liaison |
Operating
Funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Total:
$38,500.00 |
| Final
Total: $222,900.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of
Compliance (Uploaded on 9/9/2009 9:27:20
AM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The
SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of
teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school
only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative
of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
No. Disagree with
the above statement.
Measures Being Taken to Comply with SAC
Requirement
South Tech Academy, a charter school
in Palm Beach County, does not have a separate SAC. However, the school’s
Governing Board monitors the School Improvement Plan through a
sub-committee.
| Projected use of SAC
Funds |
Amount |
| Officer Principe Training |
1500 |
| Student Conference Expenses
|
10000 |
| Student Testing Fees |
5000
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming
Year
On-going, depending on school
needs.
SAC Members
| Members |
| 1)
Jeanette Jimenez,
Principal |
| 2)
Cathy Lewis, SAC Chair |
| 3)
Toby Lamb, Student |
| 4)
Emily Ferris,
Teacher |
| 5)
Carl McKoy, Business Member |
| 6)
Robert Kesten,
Business Member |
| 7)
Steven Davis,
Business Member |
| 8)
Les Goldstein,
Business Member |
| 9)
Donna Baize, Parent |
| 10)
Lesley Kibler,
Parent |
| 11)
Maria Werrlein,
Parent |
| 12)
Don Zimmerman,
Community Member |
| 13)
Rep. Maria Sachs,
Community Member |
| 14)
Walt Benner, Community Member |
| 15)
Jeanne Burdsall,
Community Member |
| 16)
Ira Dornfeld,
Community Member |
| 17)
Susan Fein Holtz,
Community Member |
| 18)
Nicole Handy,
Community Member |
| 19)
Peter Jarrett,
Community Member |
| 20)
Peggy Johnson,
Community Member |
| 21)
Lisa Chirikjian,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
| 2008-2009 Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Palm Beach SOUTH TECH
ACADEMY 1571 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades
tested:
|
Read: 584 Math: 583 |
2008-2009 School Grade1: |
D |
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent
tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and
c2). |
This section
shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor
(Part b2). |
This section
shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to
determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students?
|
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
65% scoring at or above grade level in
Reading? |
68% scoring at or above grade level in
Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by
1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by
1%? |
Percent of Students
below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students
below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be
proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be
proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4 |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
25 |
N |
64 |
N |
89 |
|
Y |
51 |
73 |
Y |
76 |
75 |
N |
36 |
36 |
N |
26 |
N |
65 |
N |
| WHITE |
99 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
34 |
N |
77 |
Y |
86 |
|
Y |
65 |
85 |
Y |
60 |
66 |
N |
27 |
23 |
NA |
33 |
N |
79 |
NA |
| BLACK |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
26 |
N |
60 |
N |
88 |
|
Y |
42 |
65 |
Y |
80 |
74 |
N |
45 |
40 |
Y |
27 |
N |
61 |
NA |
| HISPANIC |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
19 |
N |
62 |
N |
92 |
91 |
Y |
59 |
68 |
Y |
81 |
81 |
N |
35 |
38 |
N |
22 |
N |
63 |
N |
| ASIAN |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
21 |
N |
62 |
N |
88 |
94 |
Y |
57 |
66 |
Y |
83 |
79 |
N |
36 |
38 |
N |
22 |
N |
63 |
N |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
7 |
N |
46 |
N |
79 |
87 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
|
93 |
NA |
|
54 |
NA |
10 |
N |
45 |
N |
| 2007-2008 Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Palm Beach SOUTH TECH
ACADEMY 1571 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades
tested:
|
Read: 592 Math: 592 |
2007-2008 School Grade1: |
D |
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent
tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and
c2). |
This section
shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor
(Part b2). |
This section
shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to
determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students?
|
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
58% scoring at or above grade level in
Reading? |
62% scoring at or above grade level in
Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by
1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by
1%? |
Percent of Students
below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students
below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be
proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be
proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4 |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
24 |
N |
64 |
Y |
|
89 |
N |
69 |
51 |
N |
82 |
76 |
NA |
47 |
36 |
NA |
30 |
NA |
78 |
NA |
| WHITE |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
40 |
N |
73 |
Y |
|
86 |
N |
68 |
65 |
N |
76 |
60 |
NA |
36 |
27 |
NA |
47 |
NA |
83 |
NA |
| BLACK |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
20 |
N |
55 |
N |
|
88 |
N |
60 |
42 |
N |
88 |
80 |
NA |
62 |
45 |
NA |
24 |
NA |
73 |
NA |
| HISPANIC |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
19 |
N |
65 |
Y |
|
92 |
Y |
79 |
59 |
N |
81 |
81 |
NA |
41 |
35 |
NA |
26 |
NA |
79 |
NA |
| ASIAN |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
17 |
N |
64 |
Y |
|
88 |
N |
74 |
57 |
N |
86 |
83 |
NA |
48 |
36 |
NA |
22 |
NA |
78 |
NA |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
77 |
53 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES |
99 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
89 |
79 |
N |
68 |
68 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| 2006-2007 Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Palm Beach SOUTH TECH
ACADEMY 1571 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades
tested:
|
Read: 554 Math: 552 |
2006-2007 School Grade1: |
D |
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent
tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and
c2). |
This section
shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor
(Part b2). |
This section
shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to
determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students?
|
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
51% scoring at or above grade level in
Reading? |
56% scoring at or above grade level in
Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by
1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by
1%? |
Percent of Students
below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students
below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be
proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be
proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2005 |
2006 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4 |
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
18 |
N |
53 |
N |
86 |
|
Y |
51 |
69 |
Y |
78 |
82 |
NA |
52 |
47 |
NA |
31 |
NA |
66 |
NA |
| WHITE |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
24 |
N |
64 |
Y |
85 |
|
Y |
60 |
68 |
Y |
69 |
76 |
NA |
46 |
36 |
NA |
38 |
NA |
66 |
NA |
| BLACK |
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
12 |
N |
38 |
N |
83 |
|
Y |
38 |
60 |
Y |
87 |
88 |
NA |
64 |
62 |
NA |
24 |
NA |
63 |
NA |
| HISPANIC |
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
19 |
N |
59 |
Y |
89 |
|
Y |
63 |
79 |
Y |
79 |
81 |
NA |
47 |
41 |
NA |
32 |
NA |
69 |
NA |
| ASIAN |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
75 |
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED |
99 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
14 |
N |
52 |
N |
85 |
|
Y |
60 |
74 |
Y |
81 |
86 |
NA |
54 |
48 |
NA |
29 |
NA |
64 |
NA |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS |
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
42 |
77 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES |
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
70 |
68 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Palm Beach School
District SOUTH TECH ACADEMY 2008-2009 |
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and
Above) |
28% |
68% |
83% |
20% |
199 |
Writing and Science: Takes into
account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and
above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is
substituted for the writing and/or science component. |
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
40% |
71% |
|
|
111 |
3 ways to make gains:
Improve FCAT Levels
Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the
School? |
44% (NO) |
57% (YES) |
|
|
101 |
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest
25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in
both reading and math. |
| % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the
graduation requirement on the FCAT retake |
57% |
43% |
|
|
0 |
If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the
graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus
points are awarded |
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate
progress, and % of students tested |
Palm Beach School
District SOUTH TECH ACADEMY 2007-2008 |
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and
Above) |
26% |
66% |
74% |
19% |
185 |
Writing and Science: Takes into
account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and
above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is
substituted for the writing and/or science component. |
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
44% |
77% |
|
|
121 |
3 ways to make gains:
Improve FCAT Levels
Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the
School? |
47% (NO) |
75% (YES) |
|
|
122 |
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest
25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in
both reading and math. |
| % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the
graduation requirement on the FCAT retake |
42% |
62% |
|
|
0 |
If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the
graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus
points are awarded |
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate
progress, and % of students tested |
Palm Beach School
District SOUTH TECH ACADEMY 2006-2007 |
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and
Above) |
20% |
56% |
84% |
30% |
190 |
Writing and Science: Takes into
account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and
above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is
substituted for the writing and/or science component. |
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
35% |
66% |
|
|
101 |
3 ways to make gains:
Improve FCAT Levels
Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the
School? |
42% (NO) |
66% (YES) |
|
|
108 |
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest
25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in
both reading and math. |
| % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the
graduation requirement on the FCAT retake |
41% |
45% |
|
|
0 |
If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the
graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus
points are awarded |
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
| Percent Tested = 98% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate
progress, and % of students tested |